Leading ACID member, designer and manufacturer Teemo Designs recently took legal action in respect of UK unregistered design right infringement and copyright infringement against LRUK (Retail) Limited t/a La Redoute, a French multi-channel retailer in the business of offering to the wider market a variety of products, including furniture.

Teemo markets furniture to a range of household names under its own brand, as well as having a significant white label offering. Teemo alleged that La Redoute was actively and blatantly infringing several intellectual property rights through selling exact replicas of Teemo’s “Barber” furniture range.

Through its lawyers, ACID legal affiliates McDaniels Law, Teemo sent a letter before action asserting its rights. There was extensive pre-action correspondence in relation to the claim in which the Defendant was quick to claim independent creation as a defence for most of its products. The Defendant even cited email correspondence from its designers and manufacturers, with the intent of confirming the same. The Defendant conceded, however, relatively early in pre-action correspondence on two of its products and provided undertakings not to advertise, offer to sell, and/ or sell those products.

Kelly Hudson, Director of McDaniels Law and an ACID Legal Affiliate said, “It became increasingly clear that a settlement was not forthcoming in the matter and in December 2022, the Claimant issued proceedings at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (“IPEC”) (claim number IP-2022-000109). The Defendant sought various extensions to file its Defence and upon filing of the same, it was clear the Defendant’s position had changed substantially from that it set out in over two-years’ worth of pre-action correspondence. The Defendant, in its Defence, disputed it was the proper party to the claim of design right infringement, which was unexpected given it had engaged substantively with the claim on the basis it was. It claimed, in its Defence, that the parent company, La Redoute S.A.S was in fact the proper party to the claim and that the Defendant was not involved in the design of its products and that it simply imports and sells La Redoute S.A.S products.”

Nick Green, Managing Director of Teemo said, Shortly before our response to the Defence and Counterclaim was due to be filed, La Redoute made a Part 36 offer to settle, and we decided to accept this. They undertook not to sell the infringing products and to pay us a sum of damages. Under part 36 rules, they are also liable for some of our costs in line with the court rules which have now also been decided following an application to have them summarily assessed on the papers at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC). I am pleased that this was a successful outcome, reiterating our absolute determination to always enforce our IP rights.”

Dids Macdonald OBE., CEO of ACID said, “The ongoing stress, cost, and time that this has caused Teemo is unacceptable, and I am surprised that a company like La Redoute does not have stronger corporate social responsibility regarding IP ethics, compliance, and respect. I hope they will think seriously about this in the future.”